Category: Essays

Discuss the biggest challenges that face Qatari businesses today (approximately 250 – 350 words).

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

 

Answer 2 of the following:

Identify the two artworks.

Compare the two paintings discussing the importance of the human figure as well as the meaning [s] .

Start by a comparative formal analysis [depicting the similarities and the differences in terms of elements of art and organization.], identifying and explaining the similarities and the differences in terms of material, form and subject …, then explain the strategies that modify the meaning of the feminine subject, the female nude. Finally position the artist’s purpose within the context [art/social/political etc…]

 

Identify the work.

In what ways is this work ‘different’ from other early modern movements namely impressionism and expressionism? [start by reading the intro to PartIII in at in theory]

Discuss the artist role/identity and the importance of the medium used as a key to communication and a form of consumerism. What aspects of the work make it ‘modern’? To sum up, what are the strategies employed and to what end?

3- Discuss the ‘urinal’ of Duchamp.

What notions does the work challenge? Identify at 2 least and support your discussion with clear and valid arguments drawing from your readings, others artworks and discussions in class.

Grading:

You are examined on your understanding of thematic and stylistic issues and on your ability to analyze the work.

Make sure to incorporate the reading material of the course, and the class’ discussions. You can add outside sources

Make sure you quote and cite whenever needed!

Tips:

In all your discussions: identify the artists and the works first! Formal means such as the size and the material used ARE important. You can include bibliographies and historical issues if they are relevant. The social context is crucial and the response then is relevant.

Work on organizing an argumentative essay. Identify the elements in the work to support your arguments. Use clear and simple sentences to express your ideas. Your thesis is a reformulation of the topic; you might need to narrow it. Use the thesis to unify your essay.

 

Length and Format: max 750 words for each question. Font 12, no space between lines. Your Id number, class and assignment number on top left of the pages. [Stapled- no folders]

 

Due Date: Friday, May 27 , 2010.

Submission forms:

A printout Kindly put the printout in my mail box [Fine Arts Bldg. 1^st floor] by 4PM.and upload it on ‘turnitin’ by 12pm on due date.

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

reflective essay – critique of the article should be done. The use of appropriate referencing is expected and will be assessed. critically analysis should be done before the conclusion.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

– I need a persuasive outline for speech AND an essay for this project.
– To persuade audience members to change an attitude, belief, or behavior.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

this essay should be about the length of five paragraphs (500 – 600 words), it should answer the question and explain the answer in a way to let the teacher know that im fully understanding what globalization. there is a recorded voice for the teacher talking about globalization (11:09 min, there are others but not need but can be helpful) explaining what it is, this can be really helpful for this essay to let you know what we mean about globalization in our class so you can answer the question in a way to let the teacher know that i heard the recorded lecture and not just went online and searched it but i also dont mind adding things from a source other than the recorded lecture as long it will be the same perspective as what the teacher said. you can answer the question by giving examples, and explanation, but actually there is no specific instruction on answering it.

the question is: How are today’s globalization processes different from those of earlier eras? Why is it important for individuals to understand globalization trends?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Summary: Provide main points of each chapter. The main points are what you think were the most important issues discussed in the book.

Critique: What did you like or dislike about the author’s presentation.

Reviews: Must use at least 2 literary reviews of the book in your paper and state if and why you agree with the review or not.

Must have title page, and a list of "Works Cited"

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

• The introduction starts on a new page (the third page of your paper), and the title of your paper should appear at the top of the first page of the introduction.
• Introduce the topic with a description of the problem or issue being investigated.
• Develop the background by summarizing relevant prior research.
• It is normally a good idea to dedicate a paragraph to each of the relevant articles you have read.
• You should include pertinent information about the previous studies (this may include hypotheses, methodology, findings and conclusions).
Regarding In-Text Citations:
• Refer to articles by their authors and the date of the study, not the title of the study. For example:
Smith and Jones (1978) discovered that…
Several studies have found that anxiety negatively affects test performance (Brown,
2000; Smith & Jones, 1978).
• Note that references are listed in alphabetical order and are linked by a semicolon.
• When the authors are referred to in a sentence, “and” is used, but when the authors names appear in parentheses at the end of a sentence “&” is used.
• If an article has more than three authors, after the first time you reference their names in the text (e.g. Smith, Jones & Brown, 2003), you may refer to the research as Smith et al.,
2003.
• If you refer to a study more than once in a paragraph, you can omit the date. However, if you refer to the study in a different paragraph, you must include the date again.
• If you use a direct quotation, you must include the page number(s).
• Provide a rationale for why you conducted this study.
• Give a brief overview of your study and present hypotheses about the expected results of the study.
• Explain the rationale for your hypotheses, relating them back to the previous research.
• See APA Manual pp. 15-17 for further information.

MAKE SURE THEY ARE ALL JOURNAL ARTICLES!

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

For this week’s Case Brief assignment, you only have to do the Holding and the Rationale)

Read the link to the majority opinion (by Justice Stevens) in the Illinois v. Cabelles case.
03-923.ZO.html

Complete the case brief by adding the Holding and Rationale.

CITATION: Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005).

FACTS:
An Illinois state trooper stopped a motorist for speeding and radioed in. A second trooper, overhearing the transmission, drove to the scene with his narcotics-detection dog and walked the dog around the car while the first trooper wrote the motorist a warning ticket. When the dog alerted at the automobile’s trunk, the officers searched the trunk, found marijuana, and made an arrest. Caballes was convicted of the drug offense and sentenced to 12 years imprisonment and a fine of $256,136. The Illinois Supreme Court reversed the conviction. The case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Research Report – Qualitative Research // Basic Critique Form

Format (10%)

Title page, APA format with CUC date and instructor addition

            Structure

Neatly typewritten

Correct spelling and grammar

Correct sentence structure

Evidence of logical topic development

APA citations, headings, margins, spacing, font

Length – 3 pages, not including references

Content (90%)

Summary of article. [ 10%]

Examine the organization and presentation of the report

Remember, this is a critique of the research article, and the summary is a critique summary, not a summation of the author’s work.

 

1. Complete, concise, clearly presented, and logically organized
2. Does not include excessive jargon that is difficult for students and practicing nurses to read
3. References are complete, current and consistent in format
4. Authors have the educational and clinical credentials to conduct the study

 

Identification of report elements. [ 25% ]

Evaluate objectively, then explain how these elements from the chosen study meet (or do not meet) the expected definition and purpose of each element

1. Descriptive Vividness
2. Documentation of Participants
3. Methodological Congruence
4. Ethical Standards
5. Auditability
6. Analytical and Interpretive Preciseness
7. Philosophical / Theoretical Connectedness
8. Heuristic Relevance
   1. Intuitive Recognition
   2. Relationship to existing Body of Knowledge

Strengths and weaknesses of article. [ 35% ]

 In this comparison and analysis phase of the critique:

Consider how the research elements relate to one another, particularly in reference to the stated research design. Here is a suggestion list of elements to consider. Reference your Research text also, as this is not an exhaustive list.

• is the research objective format at a comparable level to the stated design
• do the operational tools measure the concept
• is the sampling method and plan style appropriate for the chosen research design
• has the author related the theoretical framework to concept variables, and outcomes
• is the problem heuristic to nursing, does the theoretical basis related to nursing concerns
• are limitations (both types) and biases addressed – can you identify possible concerns to generalizability
• validity and reliability of instruments / data : of outcomes due to uncontrolled threats
• does the author support the study rigor expected for the stated design
• are study variables – demographics, setting – controlled sufficiently for chosen research design

1. Specify examples
2. Justify your criticisms of these examples
3. Suggest research method alternatives

Implications.  [ 20% ]

Explore implications of the study for –

1. Professional clinical practice
2. Further research (higher level, replication for changes in elements)

 

Use the following grid to guide your reading and analysis of the 8 points above:

 

STANDARDS/EVALUATION CRITERIA

Descriptive Vividness Was the significance of the study adequately described? Was the purpose of the study clearly described? Were the interpretations presented in a descriptive way that illuminated more than the quotes did?

Documentation of Participants Were the study participants described in detail? Was the selection of participants reasonable? Was a rationale provided for participant selection? 3.  Were the context and location of the study described with sufficient detail to determine if the findings are applicable to other settings?

Methodological Congruence Were the assumptions underlying the study articulated? Were the assumptions and data collection procedures congruent? Was adequate trust established with the participants? Was there an open dialog and conversational approach to data collection? Were research questions articulated? Did the researcher ask questions that explore participants’ experiences, beliefs, values, or perceptions? Was the data collection process adequately described? Did the researcher spend sufficient time with participants gathering data? Did the researcher conduct multiple interviews? Was the approach of multiple data collectors similar? Was the method of selecting and gaining access to the study participants reasonable? Was the role of the researcher during the interview process described? Were qualitative credentials and expertise of the researcher(s) described?

Ethical Standards Were the participants informed of their rights? Was informed consent obtained? Were participants’ rights protected?

 

Auditability Was the decision trail used in arriving at conclusions described in adequate detail? Can the findings be linked with the data? Were enough participant quotes included to support the findings? 3.   Were the data sufficiently rich to support the conclusions? Did the participants describe specific examples of the phenomenon being investigated?

Analytical and Interpretative Preciseness Do the categories, themes, or findings present a whole picture? Did the findings yield a meaningful picture of the phenomenon under study? Were the findings returned to participants or experts in the area? Did two or more researchers participate in data analysis? How were disagreements about data analysis handled?

Philosophical/Theoretical Connectedness Was a clear connection made between the data and nursing practice? Did the researcher identify the philosophical or theoretical basis for the study? Were citations provided for the philosophical or theoretical approach used? Was the philosophical or theoretical basis of the study consistent with the study assumptions, data collection process, and analysis and interpretative methods used? Were citations provided for the philosophical or theoretical approach used?

 

Heuristic Relevance:      Intuitive Recognition Can the reader recognize the phenomenon described in the study? 2.   Are the findings consistent with common meanings or experiences?

Relationship to Existing Body of Knowledge Did the researcher adequately examine the existing body of knowledge? Did the researcher compare and contrast the findings with those of other studies? Did the researcher describe lacunae in current understandings that would account for unique findings?

Threats to Nursing  a) Practice,  b) Research,  or  c) Education Are the findings relevant to nursing practice, research, or education? Did the reader learn more than had been previously reported in the literature? Do the findings have implications for related cases? Are suggestions for further study identified?

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

I don’t need a title page because I will do it myself. I don’t have a topic. The writer can pick anything to write about. Thank you!

1. Thesis should be specific, concise, and defensible. A focussed, well argued.
2. It should be debatable. For example merely explaining the nature of a disease or treatment in itself is weak thesis, but taking a stand about it makes strong one, such as criticizing the current methods used or the public’s ignorance of the issue.
3. Ideally five or more sources
4. Your paper should say something that is not commonly known or believed.
5. APA format 6 pages

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]