What discipline should take the lead in addressing the safety issue? Explain in detail the issue you are addressing. Discuss the issue that you selected and how it impacted or could impact patient care.

Paper: Patient Safety Review Submit Assignment Due Aug 12 by 11:59pm Points 150 Submitting a file upload For this assignment, you are to select an article from a peer-reviewed nursing journal about a patient safety issue or error that impacted patient care or resulted in a sentinel event. The patient safety issue can be something that you have read about, have concerns about, or even something that you have experienced in your practice. Your paper should include a detailed explanation about the safety issue and determine if there is current research being done in this area. Consider initiatives that could be put into place to correct or prevent future issues. What kind of precautions would be needed to avoid a repetition of this particular issue? From which discipline might this precaution emerge (e.g., nursing, pharmacy, medicine, nursing administration, hospital administration)? Is there evidence that demonstrates either research being done in this area or new recommendations to address this particular system failure issue? Have you had personal experience with the particular issue addressed and if so, how was it addressed at your facility? An article by Judy Smetzer is attached for your review. Do not use this article for your critique; it is provided to you for use as a reference for some ideas. Download the following article: Smetzer, J. L. (1998). Lesson from Colorado: Beyond blaming individuals. Nursing Management, 29(6), 4951. Format Requirements References should not be older than five years, except in cases where the reference is considered a classic in the particular field. Main reference will be the base of your paper, plus a minimum of two supporting references All written assignments must be typed (double-spaced), and APA style must be used where appropriate Review guidelines and rubric found in the syllabus Submit this assignment as a Word document to Turnitin.com (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. then in Canvas This paper is considered late if not submitted by due date and late points will be assessed accordingly Guidelines This paper is worth 150 points Upload to Turnitin.com (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. then submit in Canvas Paper is due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. ET Rubric Patient Safety Review Rubric Patient Safety Review Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome CONTENT (1) Article is from a peer reviewed nursing journal addressing a patient safety issue, concern or sentinel event. 30.0 pts EXCELLENT Selected appropriate article from a peer reviewed nursing journal. Focus of article was patient safety with the identification of an issue, concern or sentinel event. 24.0 pts GOOD Selected appropriate article from a peer reviewed nursing journal. Focus of article was patient safety with the identification of an issue, concern or sentinel event. 18.0 pts FAIR Did not use a nursing journal or did not identify a patient safety issue, concern or sentinel event. 0.0 pts DEFICIENT Did not use a nursing journal and did not identify a patient safety issue, concern or sentinel event. 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome (2) Issue is clearly presented with potential root cause. Discussed precautions and relates to practice setting. 30.0 pts EXCELLENT Identified three interventions needed to prevent repetition and is reflective of critical thinking and a solid understanding of the issue. Discussed precautions and relates to practice setting. 24.0 pts GOOD Identified two interventions needed to prevent repetition and is reflective of critical thinking and a solid understanding of the issue. Addresses how the issue, concern or sentinel impacts practice and/or potential patient outcomes. 18.0 pts FAIR Identified one interventions needed to prevent repetition and is reflective of critical thinking and a solid understanding of the issue. Did not discuss impact on clinical practice or patient outcome. 0.0 pts DEFICIENT Did not identify any intervention to prevent repetition 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome (3) Identifies and provides rationale as to which discipline should take the lead in addressing the problem. 25.0 pts EXCELLENT Appropriately identified and provides a detailed a reason for selection of key discipline to prevent repetition. 20.0 pts GOOD Appropriately identified and offered a basic reason for selection of key discipline to prevent repetition. 15.0 pts FAIR Inappropriately identified and poor reasoning for selection of key discipline to prevent repetition. 0.0 pts DEFICIENT Did not complete for both system failures. Did not discuss impact on clinical practice or patient outcome. 25.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome (4) Summary of current research article/reference (within 5 years) clearly related to correction of the issue or identification of further research needed. 30.0 pts EXCELLENT Provided excellent, concise yet detailed, summary of current literature. Summary of interventions to address issue and/or prevent. Identifies if future research needed and if so provides ideas for that research 18.0 pts GOOD Provided basic, yet clear summary of current literature. Summary of interventions to address issue and/or prevent. Identifies if future research needed but did not offer suggestions 12.0 pts FAIR Provided brief summary of current literature. Summary of interventions to address issue and/or prevent. Did not identify if future research is needed or what that might be. 0.0 pts DEFICIENT Did not provide a summary of current research and did not address any interventions to address the issue and/or prevent future concerns. 30.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome PRESENTATION APA format, writing style, grammar, spelling, punctuation etc., and is 4-6 pages (text only). Includes at least 2 current references in addition to the primary article Turnitin.com report. 35.0 pts EXCELLENT APA style is perfect! Two references in addition to the primary article Submitted to dropbox and Turnitin by due date. 25.0 pts GOOD APA format not followed in one area: running head, citations, references, margins, font, page numbers, page limit, clarity, concise, conclusion and/or grammatical or spelling difficulties. Once reference in addition to the primary journal Submitted to dropbox and Turnitin by due date. 15.0 pts FAIR APA format not followed in two areas: running head, citations, references, margins, font, page numbers, page limit, clarity, concise, conclusion and/or grammatical or spelling difficulties. Turnitin report reflects poor documentation of a couple of sources. No additional references were provided in addition to the primary article Submitted to both dropbox and/or Turnitin by due date. 0.0 pts DEFICIENT APA format not followed in three or more areas running head, citations, references, margins, font, page numbers, page limit, clarity, concise, conclusion and/or grammatical or spelling difficulties No additional resources were provided.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]