Write a 2,100- to 2,450-word paper that evaluates the current state of knowledge in the field you selected. Your paper must
• Describe the field you selected and the scope and basis of your familiarity with it.
• Identify the different kinds of knowledge practitioners and researchers in the field to draw on to inform business or leadership decisions.
• Identify the philosophical assumptions underlying research and practice in the field, including operative paradigms, normal scientific and management practice, and other characteristics that seem relevant and telling in terms of their effects on the profession.
• Evaluate whether such assumptions are justified, desirable, and consciously held by practitioners and researchers in the field. Your evaluation must consider your view of the profession and how at least one approach–positivist, conventionalist, poststructuralist, postmodernist, hermeneutic, critical, or critical realists–might challenge or augment those assumptions and their practical consequences.
Professors Instructions
The paper should be to present your findings from your analysis of the state of knowledge in your field. How are the knowledge practitioners here? The knowledge researchers? What assumptions does each group make about knowledge, cloud computing, etc? do they share assumptions are do these differ?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]