Good afternoon,
I need you to research the information and write the email for me to senator Larry Taylor. I have also provided a sample email below:
This information goes in the identifying your legislators box. All information will be in original document sent to you and return in original document after you complete.
Topic for you to research and write about in letter for me is reimbursement in dialysis.
This goes in box for directory on form.
Texas State Senate District 11–Senator Larry Taylor
Capitol Office: CAP GE.5
Capitol Phone: (512) 463-0111
Capitol Address: P.O. Box 12068, Capitol Station
Austin, TX 78711
District Address: 6117 Broadway, Suite 122
Pearland TX 77581
Phone: (281) 485-9800
Larry.taylor@senate.stae.tx.us
State District Offices
Texas State Representative
Texas State House District 29–Representative Ed Thompson
Capitol Office: EXT E2.506
Capitol Phone: (512) 463-0707
Capitol Address: P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768
District Address: P.O. Box 2129
Pearland TX 77588
Phone: (281) 485-6565
Texas State Board of Education Member
Texas State SBOE District 7–Mr. David Bradley
State Board of Education Member Websites
In second box for email write to 1st legislator Larry Taylor
Title of email
Reimbursement of Dialysis below is a article you can formulate from your own creative scholarity writing to help.Should be one page long. Or you can research other information. The message I am trying to get across is more money should be increased for dialysis
Institutes of Health
Search database
Search term
Search
Advanced
Help
Result Filters
Display Settings:
Abstract
Send to:
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1291-8. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
Reimbursement of dialysis: a comparison of seven countries.
Vanholder R1, Davenport A, Hannedouche T, Kooman J, Kribben A, Lameire N, Lonnemann G, Magner P, Mendelssohn D, Saggi SJ, Shaffer RN, Moe SM, Van Biesen W, van der Sande F, Mehrotra R; Dialysis Advisory Group of American Society of Nephrology.
Collaborators (12)
Allon M, Chonchol M, Eggers P, Inrig J, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Mehrotra R, Moe S, Saggi S, Vanholder R, Watnick S, Weiner D, Young B.
Author information
1Nephrology Section, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B9000 Ghent, Belgium. Raymond.vanholder@ugent.be
Abstract
Reimbursement for chronic dialysis consumes a substantial portion of healthcare costs for a relatively small proportion of the total population. Each country has a unique reimbursement system that attempts to control rising costs. Thus, comparing the reimbursement systems between countries might be helpful to find solutions to minimize costs to society without jeopardizing quality of treatment and outcomes. We conducted a survey of seven countries to compare crude reimbursement for various dialysis modalities and evaluated additional factors, such as inclusion of drugs or physician payments in the reimbursement package, adjustment in rates for specific patient subgroups, and pay for performance therapeutic thresholds. The comparison examines the United States, the province of Ontario in Canada, and five European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom). Important differences between countries exist, resulting in as much as a 3.3-fold difference between highest and lowest reimbursement rates for chronic hemodialysis. Differences persist even when our data were adjusted for per capita gross domestic product. Reimbursement for peritoneal dialysis is lower in most countries except Germany and the United States. The United Kingdom is the only country that has implemented an incentive if patients use an arteriovenous fistula. Although home hemodialysis (prolonged or daily dialysis) allows greater flexibility and better patient outcomes, reimbursement is only incentivized in The Netherlands. Unfortunately, it is not yet clear that such differences save money or improve quality of care. Future research should focus on directly testing both outcomes.
PMID:
22677554
[PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Publication Types, MeSH Terms
Publication Types
Comparative Study
MeSH Terms
Europe
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy
Ontario
Reimbursement Mechanisms*
Renal Dialysis/economics*
United States
LinkOut – more resources
Sample email:
To: Legislators Name
Subject: Reimbursement in Dialysis
The Honorable Larry Taylor
Texas Senate
Dear Senator Taylor.
Then body of email and concern one page
Sincerely,
Diana Ina,RN
2701 Hidden Bay Ct.
Pearland , Texas 77584
———-
Added on 11.02.2015 23:48
Good afternoon,
I need you to research the information and write the email for me to senator Larry Taylor. I have also provided a sample email below:
This information goes in the identifying your legislators box. All information will be in original document sent to you and return in original document after you complete.
Topic for you to research and write about in letter for me is reimbursement in dialysis.
This goes in box for directory on form.
Texas State Senate District 11–Senator Larry Taylor
Capitol Office: CAP GE.5
Capitol Phone: (512) 463-0111
Capitol Address: P.O. Box 12068, Capitol Station
Austin, TX 78711
District Address: 6117 Broadway, Suite 122
Pearland TX 77581
Phone: (281) 485-9800
Larry.taylor@senate.stae.tx.us
State District Offices
Texas State Representative
Texas State House District 29–Representative Ed Thompson
Capitol Office: EXT E2.506
Capitol Phone: (512) 463-0707
Capitol Address: P.O. Box 2910
Austin, TX 78768
District Address: P.O. Box 2129
Pearland TX 77588
Phone: (281) 485-6565
Texas State Board of Education Member
Texas State SBOE District 7–Mr. David Bradley
State Board of Education Member Websites
In second box for email write to 1st legislator Larry Taylor
Title of email
Reimbursement of Dialysis below is a article you can formulate from your own creative scholarity writing to help.Should be one page long. Or you can research other information. The message I am trying to get across is more money should be increased for dialysis
Institutes of Health
Search database
Search term
Search
Advanced
Help
Result Filters
Display Settings:
Abstract
Send to:
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1291-8. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
Reimbursement of dialysis: a comparison of seven countries.
Vanholder R1, Davenport A, Hannedouche T, Kooman J, Kribben A, Lameire N, Lonnemann G, Magner P, Mendelssohn D, Saggi SJ, Shaffer RN, Moe SM, Van Biesen W, van der Sande F, Mehrotra R; Dialysis Advisory Group of American Society of Nephrology.
Collaborators (12)
Allon M, Chonchol M, Eggers P, Inrig J, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Mehrotra R, Moe S, Saggi S, Vanholder R, Watnick S, Weiner D, Young B.
Author information
1Nephrology Section, University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B9000 Ghent, Belgium. Raymond.vanholder@ugent.be
Abstract
Reimbursement for chronic dialysis consumes a substantial portion of healthcare costs for a relatively small proportion of the total population. Each country has a unique reimbursement system that attempts to control rising costs. Thus, comparing the reimbursement systems between countries might be helpful to find solutions to minimize costs to society without jeopardizing quality of treatment and outcomes. We conducted a survey of seven countries to compare crude reimbursement for various dialysis modalities and evaluated additional factors, such as inclusion of drugs or physician payments in the reimbursement package, adjustment in rates for specific patient subgroups, and pay for performance therapeutic thresholds. The comparison examines the United States, the province of Ontario in Canada, and five European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom). Important differences between countries exist, resulting in as much as a 3.3-fold difference between highest and lowest reimbursement rates for chron
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]