Answer each of the following four (4) questions in your own words. Each response should be in the form of a cogent argument. We are interested in your opinion on each topic below, supported with examples from the readings and lectures. Please use complete sentences and limit your answers to one paragraph (4-8 sentences). If you refer to a course reading, please cite the author, year, and page number (e.g., Hyde and DeLamater 2010:56). Be sure to cite any exact quotes in quotation marks. If you refer to a lecture, please cite the lecture title and slide (e.g., Sexual Behavior Lecture: Slide 4) . Please use only the course materials in Module 3. Do not use outside sources to complete this assignment. To understand how your assignment will be graded, please see the grading rubric provided below. Question 1: (4 points) Does labeling something ‘deviant’ only make sense in comparison to what is normal? Question 2: (4 points) Why do certain acts seem to be ‘deviant’ in some societies but ‘normal’ in others, and why do other acts seem to be universally ‘deviant’? Question 3: (4 points) Describe three types of perspectives (i.e., statistical, sociological, psychological, medical, anthropological) used to understand what is ‘normal’ and what is ‘deviant’. Question 4: (4 points) Is one of the perspectives you described above in Question 3 better than the others, or are multiple perspectives required?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.[order_calculator]