Category: Essays

Discuss any gaps in services identified or barriers to services. How do these impact services provided by social workers? A brief summary of the social problem, statistics, risk factors, important assessment items to look for, impact on clients, and treatment/services options. Please keep in mind who your audience is for this presentation (beginning social workers) and purpose to provide an overview of the social problem assigned.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Be sure to address how knowledge, politics, and society changed. In addition, discuss the relationship between the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. Be as specific as possible and be HISTORICALLY ACCURATE. Reference: Spielvogel, Jackson J. Western Civilization. Vol. II (2) ISBN: 978-1285436555 No other sources can be used except the textbook. https://www.biography.com/video/louis-xiv-full-episode-2073406805 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-XiG8S4o_A&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4mwtJ5bTHI&feature=youtu.be

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Neoclassical and radical economics? Different theories? Nothing but big words? One theory to explain the economy is plenty. Opinion: 275 words Write an opinion about Neoclassical and radical economics. Also write an opinion about the economy, if one system can explain it.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Advanced Practice Leadership Paper from an ethic of care Guidelines PURPOSE The purpose of this application is to provide the student an opportunity to critically appraise advanced nursing practice leadership from an ethic of care perspective. COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes. CO4: Assimilate relationship-based and patient-centered care attributes for interprofessional collaboration in advanced nursing practice (PO #8). CO6: Formulate selected strategies for increasing interprofessional collaboration and influence across diverse personal, professional, and/or practice settings (PO #8). CO7: REQUIREMENTS 1. To complete this application, you will need to access to the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Research Help in the left-hand menu. When clicked, it reveals a list of “Tools” or PDFs on how to do conduct various searches of the required databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and JBI) through the portals (EBSCO and OVID) provided. 2. The Advanced Nursing Practice Leadership from an ethic of care paper is worth 275 points and will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria rubric. 3. Create your manuscript using Microsoft Word 2010 (a part of Microsoft Office 2010) or later version, You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word 2010 document because it will end in .docx. 4. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this paper may be posted under the Q & A Forum. 5. The length of the paper is to be no fewer than six and no greater than eight pages, excluding the title page and reference pages. 6. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface): Note: Write an introduction to the advanced nursing practice leadership dynamic but do not use Introduction as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63). a. Description of ethic of care versus ethic of justice perspectives b. Reflection on the application from an ethic of care perspective c. Conclusion PREPARING THE PAPER The following are best practices for preparing this paper. 1. When introducing the advanced nursing practice leadership dynamic, be sure to identify appropriate background information regarding the practice situation (who, what, where, when, and why). 2. When describing ethic of care versus ethic of justice perspectives, be sure to fully describe the potential impacts of each ethical perspective using current evidence. 3. When reflecting on the application from an ethic of care dynamic, be sure to fully critique factors that compel an ethic of care in todays healthcare environment. DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA Category Points % Description Introduction to the advanced nursing practice leadership dynamic Introduces the purpose of the paper and addresses all background information elements of the advanced nursing practice leadership dynamic in its practice context Description of ethic of care versus ethic of justice perspectives Individually addresses potential impacts of each ethical perspective using current evidence; uses examples from the practice context to support your assertions Reflection on the application from an ethic of care perspective Individually critiques factors that compel an ethic of care in todays healthcare environment; summarizes your critique using examples from the practice context to support your assertions Conclusion Identifies the main ideas and major conclusions from the body of your manuscript, with minor details left out; summarizes benefits of the application of an ethic of care to advanced nursing practice Clarity of writing Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure; no spelling errors or typographical errors; organized around the required components using appropriate headers APA format All information taken from another source (even if summarized) appropriately cited in manuscript and listed in references using APA (6th ed.) format 1. Document setup 2. Title and reference pages 3. Citations in the text and references Total: 275 A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. ? GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Introduction to the Advanced Nursing Practice leadership dynamic (30 points) Excellent introduction of selected advanced nursing practice leadership dynamic; rationale well presented and purpose fully developed 2730 points Basic understanding and/or limited use of advanced nursing practice leadership dynamic and/or inappropriate emphasis on an area 2326 points Little or very general introduction of leadership dynamic; little to no original explanation; inappropriate emphasis on an area 022 points Description of ethic of care versus ethic of justice perspectives (55 points) Excellent discussion of each ethical perspective; discussion of each ethical perspective supported with examples 5055 points Basic discussion of each ethical perspective; discussion of each ethical perspective not supported with examples 4249 points Little or very general discussion of each ethical perspective; little or no application to practice context or each ethical perspective not supported with examples 041 points Reflection on the application from an ethic of care perspective (55 points) Excellent discussion of advanced nursing practice leadership application; reflection on ethic of care perspective supported with practice context examples 5055 points Basic discussion of advanced nursing practice leadership application and/or reflection on ethic of care perspective not supported with practice context examples 4249 points Little or very general discussion of advanced nursing practice leadership application, or little or no reflection on ethic of care perspective and/or practice context examples 041 points Conclusion (30 points) Excellent understanding of ethic of care contributions to advanced nursing practice; conclusions well evidenced and fully developed 2730 points Basic understanding and/or limited application of ethic of care contributions to advanced nursing practice 2326 points Little or no understanding of ethic of care contributions to advanced nursing practice; inappropriate emphasis on an area. 022 points Clarity of writing (50 points) Excellent use of standard English showing original thought; no spelling or grammar errors; well organized with proper flow of meaning 4550 points Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language; no more than three spelling or grammar errors; well organized thoughts and concepts 3844 points Language needs development; four or more spelling and/or grammar errors; poorly organized thoughts and concepts 037 points APA format (55 points) APA format correct with no more than 12 minor errors. 5055 points Three to five errors in APA format and/or 12 citations missing 4249 points Multiple errors in APA formatting and/or several citations missing 041 points

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Article Review Assignment The purpose of this assignment is to get you comfortable with reading and understanding scientific research articles. Everyone will be assigned the SAME journal article that you will be responsible for reviewing. It is located in Blackboard under Assignments in the folder called Article Review. It is called Stereotype Threat and Arousal. To assist you with this assignment, I have prepared a practice article called Subjective Motivations for Sex along with a key in the same folder. This is the ONLY article that you may use for this assignment. Instructions: Read the article through once to get an idea of what it is about. Read the article a second time, this time keeping in mind the review sections described below. Article reviews should be typed in 12 point Times New Roman Font, single-spaced. Typically reviews are about 3-4 pages. Keep in mind this is not a requirement. It is a rule of thumb given the amount of information that is required for each section. Each section should be labeled as below and must be in outline form. Follow this handout closely. Make sure you label EVERY section and answer EVERY section. You will not receive points if you skip a section. Be sure to proofread for spelling and grammar. All assignments must be submitted through turnitin.com in Blackboard. If you are working with a group, be sure that all members names are included. Only one member from the group should submit the assignment on behalf of the group. Your review should include the following sections: I. Reference (4 points) The reference of the article needs to be in APA style. (Remember the correct APA format to cite a journal article in the reference section?) The information given should include the author’s names (last name, first initial), the year of publication (in parentheses), the title of the article (only the first word of the title and/or after a colon should be capitalized), the name of the journal and the volume it came from (the journal title should be capitalized, and the journal title and volume number should be in italics), and the pages of the journal that the article came from. II. Study Design — For this portion of the article review, you need to specify what type of study was conducted. State the type of study. Was it a correlational study? Was it an experimental study (where they randomly assigned people to conditions)? Or was it a longitudinal study (where they had people fill out the same questionnaires every couple of months or something like that). Another type of study? (2 points) Also include a short explanation as to why the study design is correlational, experimental, or another design. (2 points) Include a brief overview of the purpose of the study. In other words, why did the researchers conduct this study? (4 points) III. Variables — Independent variables are the conditions participants are assigned to in an experimental study. Predictor variables are similar, except they typically cannot be manipulated (e.g., self-esteem or education level), and they are used in correlational or longitudinal designs. Dependent or criterion variables are outcome variables. The term “dependent variable” refers specifically to outcomes in experimental studies whereas the term “criterion variable” refers to outcomes in correlational studies. Specify whether you should use independent/dependent or predictor/criterion terminology to label the variables in the study. (2 points) Identify the independent/predictor and dependent/criterion variables in the study (name them). (8 points) IV. Conceptual Definitions of Variables — These involve defining any terms or concepts that are central variables in the study. Do not confuse this with the operational definition of a variable which asks how variables are measured. Instead, you should provide the conceptual/theoretical definition for each of the primary variables in the study. A conceptual definition is the answer a researcher would provide if any of you were to ask How would you define your attachment style variable? Conceptual definition of independent/predictor variable(s). (4 points) Conceptual definition of dependent/criterion variable(s) (4 points) V. Participants — In this section you need to tell me a little bit about who participated in this study. This section doesn’t have to be very long; just provide enough information that your reader will know something about who participated in this study. How were the participants selected? Were there exclusion criteria? Were participants actively recruited? (4 points) Demographic Information (For example, how many people were there? Were they all from the same university? How many of them were men? How many of them were women? What was the distribution of ages, ethnicities, and any other information?) (6 points) VI. Procedure (10 points) Describe the procedures used in the study. Remember that a procedure should be so detailed that anyone else could look at your procedure and conduct the same study with very few questions. You should be VERY SPECIFIC and include the title of study, the information described to participants, and information concerning anonymity. VII. Measures/Operational Definitions — For this section, specify what types of questionnaires or other outcome measures were used. This section answers the question How were the primary variables in this study measured or operationalized? (10 points) Identify the measures/questionnaires used for the independent/predictor variable. Briefly describe each of the measures used in the study. [For example, what was the questionnaire/outcome designed to measure? How many items were on the questionnaire? How did people answer the items (e.g., participants rated items using a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1 = not at all and 5 = very much, or something like that)? If there is no information listed as to how the information was rated, you should say this. Identify the measures/questionnaires used for the dependent/criterion variable. Briefly describe each of the measures used in the study. [For example, what was the questionnaire/outcome designed to measure? How many items were on the questionnaire? How did people answer the items (e.g., participants rated items using a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1 = not at all and 5 = very much, or something like that)? If there is no information listed as to how the information was rated, you should say this. VIII. Hypotheses — What did the researchers predict? What did they expect to happen? All studies have at least 1 hypothesis, and many have quite a few more than that. (8 points) a. Identify the hypotheses for the study. You should list ALL hypotheses for the study, not a select few. Label each of your hypotheses. If there are 9 hypotheses, you should have labels from H1-H9. IX. Results — What are the main findings? For each hypothesis, you should list a result. You also need to indicate whether the results support or disconfirm a hypothesis. You should list your answer in the following format: If a result supports a hypothesis, you may say As expected, self-control was positively related to counterproductive work behaviors. If a result does not support a hypothesis, you might say Contrary to expectations, self-control was not significantly related to counterproductive work behaviors (16 points) List the results for each hypothesis and whether or not the result is consistent with the hypothesis. In general, were these results consistent with past research? Why or why not? X. Conclusions — A good place to look for conclusions is in the discussion section, usually toward the end of the article. Interpretation of the results What do these results mean in a broader sense? What do the findings mean in the big picture? What do they imply about life in the real world? (4 points) Briefly describe future directions for the line of research studied in the article. Authors always state what things should be done in a future study.Critique — Typically researchers acknowledge limitations to their own work (in the discussion section), but there may be some things that you notice that could be a problem for the study. For example, were the participants mostly women (so we don’t know if men would respond the same way)? What are some of the limitations of the study identified by the researcher(s)? What could the researchers have done that would have made the study better? (4 points) What limitations did you find with the study? Identify and describe at least 1 limitation that is not mentioned by the researchers. (4 points)
Hide

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Major: Criminal Justice Class: Judicial Process Research Paper Title: Court System for the State of Puerto Rico Instructions: – You must create a court system for the newly created state of Puerto Rico. You are to work under the assumption that Puerto Rico has just been admitted as the 51st state and build your court system from the bottom up. To be certain you understand how courts are organized in other states, you must research at least THREE current state court systems, within the United States, and use those systems to create Puerto Ricos system. Do not use Puerto Ricos current system as one of your examples. You must describe your proposal for creating Puerto Ricos municipal courts, major trial courts, appellate courts, and the states highest court. Include geographic jurisdictions. – You must also describe how judges will be chosen for each court and must discuss how judicial and attorney ethical standards will be structured and enforced. You should conduct basic research on Puerto Rico (size, geography, population, existing counties or municipios, etc.) to be certain your proposed system will actually work. – Remember to provide citations when you borrow some idea or structure from another state. – The body (not including cover page, works cited/bibliography, etc.) of the paper must be 10 pages in length, double spaced, using Times New Roman 12-point font. A works cited page with at least FIVE sources/references must be included. – This essay needs to be 100% original. It cannot be plagiarized.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Our research question is: How has digital media impacted consumer preferences regarding literature in Australia? This is the question we came up with to find out how has digital media affecting the Australian book industry. *Digital media such as internet, Tv etc..

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

overcoming the barriers for managing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Hispanic or latino 15-24 years old females. Discuss.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

This admissions requirement is intended to assess your skills and abilities at your point of entry into the MSW Program. You will find this article at the following website: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/939e/e089deff901809ac486f15f17658af1e5432.pdf. Using a 12-point font size, and Times New Roman or Courier font style, please submit a double-spaced paper.
Your response must constitute a coherent narrative which integrates the following items:
The primary issue(s) addressed by the author in the article.
The background information provided by the author on the issues?
The authors major research question and hypothesis?
The type and source of data used by the author?
The major findings?
What knowledge did you gain about social work from reading the article that you did not know before?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

The descriptive statistics and histograms displayed on the attached sheet are based on fictitious data on the salaries of teachers in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The states are grouped into the three regions as listed below.
Region 1 – North
Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas.
Region 2 – South
Delaware, Maryland, District of Columbia, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Kentucky, Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas.
Region 3 – West
Montana, Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Utah, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, Hawaii.
Data retrieved from http://www.cvgs.k12.va.us/DIGSTATS/Dmain.htmlAnswer questions 1-5 based on the attached information (see final page of this document) on teacher salaries. Please type your answers below each question.

2. In which region is the difference between the mean and the median the smallest? Relate your answer to the shape of the distribution. (Hint: In what type of distribution do we expect the mean to be equal or approximately equal to the median?)3. What is the most common salary interval in each of the three regions? Does the mean salary fall into the most common interval in any of the regions? Does your response to this question surprise you? Why or why not?4. What does the standard deviation reveal about the teachers’ salary data? In which region do the teacher salaries vary the most from the mean? Which region has the most consistent, i.e., least variable, salaries? 5. The range of salaries in Region 3 is considerably wider than the range in the other two regions. Would it be advisable to report the range as the only measure of variability for this region? Why or why not?6. An undergraduate student received a score of 42 on the midterm and a score of 84 on the final in an Introduction to Psychology course. Descriptive statistics on the two exams are listed below.
MEAN STANDARD
DEVIATION NUMBER OF
POINTS
MIDTERM 40.0 3.0 50
FINAL 78.0 5.0 100 a. Compute the students z score on the midterm and on the final b. On which exam did he have a higher standing in relation to other students in the course?7. Use the chart on p. 311 of the textbook to complete this part of the exercise. Listed below are the achievement scores of pairs of students on the same standardized test expressed as two different measures of relative position. Indicate which student in each pair performed better in relation to the norm group.
a. Alan scored in stanine 9; Bobs percentile rank was 82. b. Carols z score was -.5, Darlenes percentile rank was 54. c. Eds percentile rank was 26; Frank scored in stanine 2. d. Gails z score was +1.5; Helens percentile rank was 95.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]