Please answer the 6 Outstations as they ask and make it clear.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Please answer the 6 Outstations as they ask and make it clear.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Here’s the assignment description from my syllabus:
Paper/Presentation: You will write a paper of 2000 words on a topic chosen in consultation with me. In general, I expect that the topic you choose will be closely related to your background in music; i.e. if you are a trumpet player, you will probably choose to write about the physics of brass instruments.
• The Paper will be typed/printed, single-sided, double-spaced, using standard fonts.
• Submit two copies.
• Submit an additional digital copy via email. I will screen your paper using www.turnitin.com or some similar service to verify the originality of your writing. Quotes or any other writing which is not your own should be properly referenced and should be easy to distinguish from what you have written yourself. Illustrations which are not original should also be properly referenced. Submitting a plagiarized paper will result in failing the course. It is possible that I will ask you to have your paper screened by turnitin.com, rather than me doing it. If this happens, I will give instructions later.
• The paper will be at least 2000 words long. This is approximately seven pages, not counting illustrations.
• Cite at least three references (in standard bibliographic format) not including the text/lecture notes.
• Use at least one non-online source as a reference. You may not use Wikipedia as a reference.
• Present any online sources you use in standard bibliographic format (with the web address) and include hardcopy of a sample page.
Include a sentence or two describing how you determined that the online source was reliable.
• Papers will be graded 75% on content and 25% on style. I expect your paper to be grammatical, free of spelling errors, well organized, and written to be understandable by your classmates. This means, for example, that you should not explain in great detail material that has already been covered in class.
Here’s my rough outline of the topic:
Title: The Best Sound out of Any Room
Topic: How to experience the best acoustics in various settings.
Settings: Movie theater, in class, concert, home theater, public transportation
(Bart/ Light Rail.)
Describe usual sound arrangement: spoken word, electric speakers, front, back,
surround sound.
Describe arrangement of experience: sitting, standing, in desks, on couch.
Describe type of environment: theater, classroom, venue, bus/train
Describe the best place to be in the various locations.
Explain which setting is the most versatile in acoustic experience.
Explain which setting is the least versatile in acoustic experience.
Here are possible sources to use:
Works Cited
Barron, Michael. Auditorium Acoustics and Architectural Design. London: E & FN Spon, 1993. Print.
Cavanaugh, William J., and Joseph A. Wilkes. Architectural Acoustics: Principles and Practice. New York: Wiley, 1999. Print.
Rossing, Thomas D. Springer Handbook of Acoustics. New York, NY: Springer, 2007. Print.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]I need it broken down by chapters, if you want to combine some of the chapters that is fine. Too include separate 10 questions(not in the paper itself) that arise from the book and somehow cater to one or some of these questions: 1 Examine one’s cultural heritage in the context of American multicultural society. 2 Analyze an aspect of American culture using an interdisciplinary approach. 3 Demonstrate the impact of individualism, or at least the belief in individualism, has had in shaping the American character. 4 Compare and contrast the conflict between individualism and community in American culture. 5 Examine the issue of how Hawaii is situated in the context of the American experience. 6 Appraise various value themes in American experience and articulate issues of race, ethnicity, gender, class, and sexuality as they relate to these value themes in a broad historical context
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Please this book to complete the assignment:
Book: Socialnomics – How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live & Do Business
Please number each answe
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]I am taking a corporation taxes class and I wanted to get a price estimate for this assignment. It is due Sunday at noon and it is a tax research memo. Here are all the instructions and the one I did last year that I got an A on. There is two parts to the questions and there needs to be two issues/conclusion/analysis per part.
http://www2.gsu.edu/~accerl/
Let me know.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]I want you to write (investigation essay) 3 pages with 3 different sources. Here is the Instructor’s rules that you need to follow:
1 source from a meme website
2 source from any other area, but may not use more than one meme website, and each one should be different than the other.
I want you to write simple words, no difficult vocabulary or words.
This is the picture of the meme that I want you to write about: http://memegenerator.net/instance/19025145?urlName=Willywonka&browsingOrder=Popular&browsingTimeSpan=AllTime
If you couldn’t get the picture call me as soon as possible please. Thank you so much
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]ou need to read 6 extracts provided and summarize them. Summary of each extract needs to be put in to academic paragraphing planner provided.
For example, the summary of extract 1 goes to paragraph 1 in the body, the summary of extract 2 goes to paragraph 2 and so forth.
Please read assessment instructions carefully.
You need to find commonalities in all of the 6 extracts and come up with one topic and thesis and write it following the academic paragraphing planner provided.
You also need to have a look at the reflective paragraph form attached. It is the structure of the each paragraph in the body.
Each extract is from text books, so you can find the details of the writer and all that at the end of the extract, so you use it as in text reference and on top of that, you need to find two more relevant references which should be medical or nursing journal. They must be from a reliable source.
You just ignore the part which is crossed with red line in the extract.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]
These details are also available within the overall Module Guidance
As part of this module students will complete TWO assessments.
Component 1 – Poster Presentation:
In your smaller working groups, each will make a poster presentation based on weekly readings, group discussions and related research. The poster contributes 60% of Component 1 marks. Each student is expected to produce a Reflective Report of 750 words on their Poster presentation. This contributes 40% of Component 1 marks. Overall, Component 1 accounts for 40% of the Module assessment.
Component 2 – Unseen Exam:
At the end of the Module, an examination comprising short answers, or multiple choice or mini-essay questions will be written based on the topics covered over the course of the module. The exam will be for 2 hours and accounts for 60% of the Module assessment. The date and time for this assignment is to be confirmed later in the semester, but will take place during the scheduled exam week.
1.1. Details of assignments
Component 1: Group Poster (using Power Point template provided) and Report
TITLE: Component1: Group Poster Presentation and Individual Reflective report
WORDS: Poster: 1,000 words. Individual Reflective Report 750 words
WEIGHTING: 40% of Module assessment
DUE DATE: April 22nd 2014 (2359hrs)
PRESENTATION DATE: April 29th, 2014 (0930hrs – 1300hrs)
BOTH THE POSTER AND INDIVIDUAL REFLECTIVE REPORT ARE SUBMITTED THROUGH TURNITIN
There are ten topics for poster presentations. By the end of Week 2, each group would have chosen a Topic on which to make the Poster. Students use their small working groups to prepare the assignment. Posters must be prepared by the group members. The reflective reports on the poster are done individually. Students will be allocated a group mark for the poster and an individual mark for the reflective report. The marks will be then averaged.
In preparing the posters, you may want to share specific tasks but at the end you must have single poster to present as a group. There will be a conference style poster presentation session on April 29th, 2014 using time slots to be allocated. Students must be there to answer questions and discuss their poster as part of assessment of the poster.
An example poster will be shown to the students and will be available for display. The seminars in Week 5 focus on making your Poster Presentations. A Template and sample poster will be uploaded on the MOODLE site. Students can use the following link for some Poster Design tips:
http://clt.lse.ac.uk/workshops-and-courses/Course-resources/Poster-Design-Tips.php .
Students should start working on their topic as soon as possible. Procrastinating may jeopardise your group as well as individual mark. Students will use information from lectures, seminar discussions, in class interactive activities, weekly reading and Internet research to feed into their poster presentation.
Posters will be created in Power Point and submitted via Turnitin. There will be a designated folder accessible via the ‘Assessments’ link. One group member is responsible for submitting the poster. This should be submitted by the deadline (April 22nd 2014 by 2359hrs). There will be a separate Turnitin submission folder for the individual reflective report with each student submitting their reports individually. Please note: both the group poster and individual reports are submitted electronically via Turnitin and in hardcopy to the HAB Helpdesk by the deadline.
The hardcopy poster should be submitted in A1 format. A1 posters can be printed in the Computer Centre on the first floor. Please ask at IT Help Desk for appropriate use of the printer. Please note that this printer can take some time to print and there are several other students that require this service. Do not wait until the deadline to print out your posters. Alternatively, you can pay to have your posters printed off-campus. Below is a list of possible printers:
Zip Printers (online): http://www.zip-posters.co.uk/?gclid=CJeNst661aYCFYMTfAod81fvMw
A1 Posters (online): http://www.a1posters.co.uk/
Student Poster (online): http://www.studentposters.co.uk/
PrintExpress(online): http://www.printexpress.co.uk/?cid=Adwords&gclid=CKzo6qS91aYCFUQTfAodaDq2zQ
How to prepare and present your poster:
Sources of data you may find useful:
– Books and academic papers (including those assigned as readings);
– Additional papers searched through electronic databases (E.g. Medline) or paper journals available in the library;
– Internet websites of local, national and international organisations (e.g.: Primary Care Trusts, Local Authorities, London Health Commission, London Health Observatory, Department of Health, WHO, Health Protection Agency, etc.) (see section 5.2).
– Government and international reports available electronically and in hard copies;
– Media publications.
Submitting your poster and report
You must submit your poster and your report:
Submission to Turnitin
Submission to the Helpdesk
*Both electronic and hard copy submissions must be identical.
Submission deadlines
– Poster and Report to Turnitin and Helpdesk: April 22nd, 2014 (2359hrs)
– Poster presentation and marking: April 29th, 2014 (0930 —1330hrs)
Poster description
A poster presentation summarises information obtained from defined, peer-reviewed sources. These may include specified texts, a limited number of key texts, a range of peer-reviewed publications relevant to a specified topic or activities associated with lectures.
The poster display must directly address the topic given for the assessment, demonstrating an ability to summarise and analyse the material read, reviewed or examined. You will be expected to draw conclusions based on the material presented. The presentation should contain sufficient information to describe the topic and its significance clearly whilst avoiding too much detail. The appearance of the posters with regard to font size, colour and use of tables and figures should be considered carefully. The posters should highlight an understanding of the topic and appropriate background information. The presentation should be logically structured and self-explanatory. Have a look at the tips and example posters to help you!
Remember:
– The poster content should present clear, attractive and visually appealing content and be printed to size A1.
– It should be logically and concisely laid out according to your topic.
– The poster must have a clear title that is relevant to the chosen topic.
– Include the student numbers of all group members.
– It should contain only information relevant to the subject under consideration – using the headings provided.
– There should be a balance of appropriate and relevant text, diagrams, charts, pictures and images.
– Your poster should contain at least one visual aid (i.e. diagram, chart, table, etc.)
– The text must be word-processed and the typeface, font size, spacing and layout should be appropriate.
– The poster should be prepared using a singe PowerPoint slide 594mm × 840mm (this will be covered in the Week 3 workshop, but also see tips below).
– Colours and other ornamental elements are at the discretion of the students, but these should not overpower the poster text.
– Sources of data should be clearly identifiable, using both in-text citations and with the reference list provided on the poster and according to Harvard reference system.
How to present your poster:
The posters will be presented in a conference style sessions. Posters will be displayed and all members of the group must be present to discuss their poster with the markers during the designated time slots (see weekly schedule above). Each group member should be present to answer questions from the markers about the poster and support their other group members.
All students must attend their groups’ poster presentation. Failure to attend the session will be accounted as failure to submit the work and given a ‘0%’.
Groups can choose from the list of topics below. You will choose your topics in your seminar groups. Note, groups in the same seminars will not be allowed to present on the same topic.
Poster topics
| Poster topic |
| Climate change and climate variability. Are these public health challenges? |
| Increasing the uptake of cancer screening programmes in the UK is a public health challenge |
| STIs among young adults in the UK |
| Tuberculosis infection rates as a global and local public health issue |
| Prevention of road traffic accidents as a public health challenge |
| Natural disasters as a public health issue |
| Rates of Type II Diabetes in the UK |
| Increased HIV infections in London as a public health issue |
| The challenge presented by recent flu epidemics for public health surveillance |
Poster headings
1. Background
Provide a brief introduction or overview of the poster and provide general background information to the problem that you are addressing. You should describe and quantify the problem within the defined context or which you intend to address it (i.e. UK or globally).
2. Methods
How did you go about examining/researching your topic—how many/what credible sources did you investigate. This section should also include details on literature searches conducted using research databases.
3. Findings
This section should illustrate why your chosen problem is a public health problem, using facts and figures. This section should also include a table or figure to illustrate your findings. You must explain this figure or table in findings.
4. Discussion and Recommendations
In this section you will discuss the implications of the findings presented (e.g. What does this mean for public health policy, programmes, practice or the population affected?) and provide recommendations for how public health professionals can address the implications or issues raised. You should make at least 3 recommendations.
5. References
You must use Harvard referencing style. You must utilise at least 10 references (books, journals and/or reports). No more than 3 websites are allowed. Wikipedia is NOT allowed. Please use the appropriate referencing style to reference websites. Web addresses alone will not be accepted.
Your individual reflective report
Along with the group poster, each group member should prepare and submit an individually prepared report. In this report you must select an organisation, policy or strategy (only 1, not all 3) that has been designed to address the public health issue presented in your poster.
Your report should include:
1) A summary of the work undertaken by this organisation or a summary of the policy/strategy.
2) A discuss the significance of this organisation, policy or strategy for modern public health and this section should also include a discussion of the aims of public health and linking these to the aims of the organisation, policy or strategy chosen. For example, if you choose to work on the HIV topic, you may decide to look in more detail at the Terrence Higgins Trust, a well know HIV organisation in the UK. You would then need to address how this organisation’s work is aligned with the aims of public health (i.e. promoting health and prolonging life).
Your short report should be no longer than 1000 words and include sufficient references (a minimum of 5). Please include the word count at the end of the report (this word count includes references). Your report should contain the following headings and information:
Here you should provide a summary of the chosen policy/strategy or the work undertaken by the organisation chosen.
Here you will discuss the significance of this organisation/policy/strategy for modern public health. You should address the theoretical aims of public health and link the aims of public health to the aims of your chosen organisation/policy/strategy. Depending on your chosen organisation/policy/strategy you may need to draw on other necessary theories (i.e. health promotion, health inequalities, health policy, etc.). You must provide concrete examples to support your ideas throughout this section.
Assignment 2: Written exam
TITLE: Unseen written examination paper
DATE: Week starting 20th – 24th May 2014
WEIGHTING: 60%
This assignment is intended to test students’ understanding of the key concepts and principles of public health and their ability to apply these to public health debate and practice. The paper will be based on knowledge and skills expected to have been acquired through lectures, seminars, external and group presentations and directed reading. It will test a wide range of topics covered during the course and will enable students to demonstrate learning outcomes 1,2,3,4,5,6 (see module specifications).
The paper will be taken during 2- hour examination. The date and room will be confirmed at a later stage. All students must attend and sit the examination. For information on what happens if you do not attend the examination session please see below.
A revision session will take place in Week 12 seminar. Students will also contribute to a collaborative online-exam blog in order to prepare for the exam.
1.2 Formative assessments
Formative assessments (FAs) are tools for students’ self-evaluation. Although they do not count towards final mark, failure to do them will compromise preparedness for the exam.
The formative assessments will take the form of 3 short quizzes throughout the semester. The quizzes are designed to help you keep up with the weekly lectures and readings and to prepare you for the final, online exam. These quizzes will be made available and submitted via MOODLE. Dates for quizzes can be found in the Weekly reading schedule in section 5.4.
General description of the task:
The quizzes will take the form of multiple choice questions interpreting, explaining and calculating key module concepts. The quizzes will be undertaken in your own time and will have a submission deadline.
1.3. Assessment system
To complete the module, you will need to obtain an overall mark of 40% (PASS) and a minimum of 30% (THRESHOLD) in both the poster and the exam. The weighting of each assignment will have to be taken into account when calculating the overall mark.
If you get less than 30% for either of the assignments (even if the overall mark is higher than 40%) OR if you get less than 40% as an overall mark, you will NOT be able to complete the module at the time specified. In such a case, you will have to re-submit your poster and/or to re-sit the exam. You may need to resubmit one or both assignments according to the following rules:
|
Poster and report |
Exam |
Overall mark |
Outcome |
| < 30% | < 30% | < 30% | RESUBMIT POSTER AND RE-SIT EXAM |
| < 30% | < 40% | < 40% | RESUBMIT POSTER AND RE-SIT EXAM |
| < 40% | < 40% | < 40% | RESUBMIT POSTER AND RE-SIT EXAM |
| < 30% | ≥ 40% | < 40% | RESUBMIT POSTER ONLY |
| ≥ 40% | < 30% | < 40% | RE-SIT EXAM ONLY |
| < 40% | ≥ 40% | < 40% | RESUBMIT POSTER ONLY |
| < 40% | ≥ 40% | < 40% | RE-SIT EXAM ONLY |
| < 30% | ≥ 40% | >40% | RESUBMIT POSTER ONLY |
| > 40% | < 30% | > 40% | RE-SIT EXAM ONLY |
Should you have to resubmit (coursework) and/or re-sit the exam your module will be capped at 40%. If, after resubmitting, the module still does not receive a pass, you will have to re-sit the whole module, which also involves payment of fees.
A sample of assignment and exams papers are seen by a second and an external marker to ensure consistency and fairness.
1.4 University assessment policies
Assessment and handing in work
You are expected to complete assignments and sit the exam at the specified dates. Extensions will not be provided. Teaching staff (this includes lecturers, guest lecturers, personal tutors and seminar staff) are not permitted to give extension under ANY circumstances.
Late Hand-ins
If, for whatever reason, you submit an assignment after the set deadline, you will are entitled to fill in an Extenuating Circumstances form within two working days of the deadline. Please note that extenuating circumstances are rarely awarded (see www.uel.ac.uk/qa/extenuation.htm for more details).
A decision will then be made by the Field Board, which meets once a semester. If your application is successful, your mark in the next submission will not be capped at 40% (you will receive the mark that your course-work or exam-paper is granted with). If you are not successful, your mark in re-submission or re-sit will be capped at 40%.
Please, note that granted extenuating circumstances does not mean “additional chances”. In all circumstances, there are two opportunities for each assessed component of this module (poster and report, and exam paper). Granted extenuating circumstances only affect whether your final mark will be capped at 40%.
1.5 Assessment marking grids
Poster Evaluation
(The criteria on which posters will be marked)
Student numbers:
Please circle the appropriate number from
0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent)
Visual presentation 0 1 2 3 4 5
Visual impact, attention to detail, general layout and free from errors.
Academic content 0 1 2 3 4 5
Self-explanatory, clear and logical presentation of the work that you have undertaken. Appropriate use of data sources, tables and figures.
Analysis 0 1 2 3 4 5
Knowledgeable, logical, evidenced, appropriate amount of depth and relevance.
Accessible 0 1 2 3 4 5
The poster should communicate the topic in logical, interesting, orderly and academic manner. (The work should be presented in such a way as to make it understandable to a wider academic and public health audiences).
General marker comments:
Recommended mark:
Poster Presentation Individual Report
| F
0 – 30 |
F
30-40 |
3
40-50 |
2.2
50-60 |
2.1
60-70 |
1st 70-100 |
|
| Relevance | No relevant points or issues covered | Mostly irrelevant | Considerable parts irrelevant | Considerable parts relevant | Mostly relevant | Covers all relevant points/issues è Reasons/justifies |
| Evidence of
Understanding |
Little or no | Limited | Variable | Reasonable | Sound | Extensive è Original/creative |
| Depth | Insufficient depth | Superficial | Mainly superficial, limited deeper exploration | Some points explored deeply | Most points explored deeply | Deep exploration of all points è Critical analysis/
evaluation
|
| Development of argument/ analysis and evaluation
|
No analysis or evaluation
|
Limited analysis/ evaluation | Variable analysis/ evaluation | Reasonable analysis/ evaluation | Sound analysis/ evaluation | Extensive è Critical/analytical/original |
| Evidence of wider reading | No evidence | Limited | Some | Numerous examples | Wide ranging | Extensive è Extends scope of work |
| Use of evidence to support statements/
arguments |
None used | Limited use of references to support argument | Some use of references to support argument | Variable use of references to support argument | References mostly well used to support argument | Comprehensive è Critical analysis/
evaluation |
| Structure | No clear structure – cannot be followed | Limited – difficult to follow throughout | Some – difficult to follow in parts | Reasonable – can mostly be followed | Sound – can be followed | Organised – easy to follow è Interesting/
stimulating |
| Referencing | No referencing | Referencing incorrect | Significant errors/omissions | Some errors and/or omissions | References generally cited correctly with few errors/
omissions |
References correctly cited è Professional standard |
| Illustrations and tables | Absent/ irrelevant | Confusing/
incorrect
|
Do not support work
|
Partially support work | Clarify work | Enhance work è Extend scope of work |
| Presentation | Does not conform to guidelines | Limited conformity to guidelines | Some conformity to guidelines | Variable conformity to guidelines | Mostly conforms to guidelines | Fully conforms è Extend scope of work
to guidelines |
| Written communication (including grammar, spelling, sentence and paragraph construction) | Many errors, text cannot be followed | Frequent, major errors – text difficult to follow | Frequent errors – impairs readability | Occasional errors – text mainly clear | Few minor errors – text clear | No errors è Enhanced readability/comprehension |
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Competency Goal Statement 2:
To advance physical and intellectual competence
Throughout your CDA program with the University of Cincinnati, you will be writing six reflections on your own teaching practices. Each Reflective Statement must relate directly to one of the six Competency Goals (See below for specific requirements). Many of the Statements require the use of specific Resources in the Resource Collection as the focus of that written reflection. Each statement should be up to 500 words in length. Once written and revised, these Reflective Statements should be filed in the appropriate section of your Professional Portfolio.
For this assignment you should write your Competency Statement Goal 2: To advance physical and intellectual competence.
Begin your Reflective Statement about this Competency Goal with a paragraph describing how your teaching practices meet this Goal.
Physical
• List a personal goal that you have in this area
• List at least 2 ways that you meet this goal.
Cognitive
• List a personal goal that you have in this area
• List at least 2 ways that you meet this goal.
Communication
• List a personal goal that you have in this area
• List at least 2 ways that you meet this goal.
Creative
• List a personal goal that you have in this area
• List at least 2 ways that you meet this goal.
Then prepare at least one paragraph on each of the following:
• CS II a: Pick one of the nine learning experiences you chose for your Resource Collection (RC II). How does this experience reflect your philosophy of how to support young children’s physical development?
• CS I b: Pick another of the nine learning experiences you chose for your Resource Collection (RC II). How does this experience reflect your philosophy of how to support young children’s cognitive development?
• CS II c: Pick a third learning experience you chose for your Resource Collection (RC II). How does this experience reflect your philosophy of how to support young children’s creative development?
• CS II d: In an additional paragraph, describe ways to promote the communication/language development among all children, including dual language learners.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]will uplaod the files.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]